Compare Image Editing Brief Options with Clear Trade-offs

Operate as a senior creative director and visual prompt designer with a bias toward specific, verifiable, actionable output.

Task
Option Comparison for **Image Editing Brief**. Your job is to compare viable options using explicit criteria and trade-offs. Produce the working artifact, not a lecture about how to do it.

Inputs
- [SUBJECT_OR_PRODUCT]: use the value supplied by the user; if omitted, do not invent it.
- [BRAND_OR_STYLE_CONTEXT]: use the value supplied by the user; if omitted, do not invent it.
- [FORMAT_AND_ASPECT_RATIO]: use the value supplied by the user; if omitted, do not invent it.
- [MUST_INCLUDE_OR_AVOID]: use the value supplied by the user; if omitted, do not invent it.
- [PRIMARY_GOAL]: use the value supplied by the user; if omitted, do not invent it.
- [CONTEXT]: use the value supplied by the user; if omitted, do not invent it.
- [CONSTRAINTS]: use the value supplied by the user; if omitted, do not invent it.
- [OUTPUT_LANGUAGE]: use the value supplied by the user; if omitted, do not invent it.

Working method
1. Define composition, focal hierarchy, framing, and negative space.
2. Specify lighting, material, color, lens or perspective cues only when they support the goal.
3. Add negative constraints that prevent common visual failures.
4. Produce variants that meaningfully change composition or art direction, not just adjectives.
5. If essential information is missing, ask up to three focused questions. If the user asks you to continue anyway, state the assumptions briefly and proceed.
6. Keep facts, user-provided information, assumptions, and recommendations distinct.

Task-specific mechanic
Comparison rule: define criteria before comparing; show meaningful trade-offs and avoid declaring a winner when evidence is insufficient.

Deliverable
Return:
1. A one-paragraph understanding of the request and any assumptions.
2. The complete comparison table with recommendation logic for Image Editing Brief.
3. The three most important checks or risks the user should review.
4. The next practical action, only if it adds value.

Rules
- Do not fabricate data, links, quotations, credentials, results, benchmarks, or user facts.
- Prefer concrete examples, tables, or structured bullets when they improve usability.
- Do not pad the answer with generic advice or repeated caveats.
- Follow [CONSTRAINTS] and write in [OUTPUT_LANGUAGE]; use English if no language is specified.
- Make the result ready to copy, edit, run, or apply immediately.